The concept and conditions of termination

The dissolution of the contract is intended to resolve the contractual nexus between the contractors and the removal of all raised so that the contract lacking become void and this signified the dissolution of the contract, like nullity aimed at the demise of Streptococcus Association is that they are distinguished from each other in terms of the reasons why both of them it stops act legal because it did not arise true, was left behind one of the pillars or condition while the conditions shown on the right of dissolution decade due to lack of fully represent him and can say as well that the invalidity or revocation means the formation stage while the other regards decay at a later stage is the stage of execution of the contract
Slimming decade of termination or Alanevsakh and annulment either be Atvakie or by virtue of the judiciary and begin studying the annulment of both types have material provided 119 BC that he (in binding contracts for both sides if no one Contracting fulfilled his commitment to jazz contractor other, after Agmar debtor to demand the implementation of the contract or revokes with compensation in both cases if the situation so requires, and the judge may grant the debtor-term depending on the circumstances as he or she may be refused if the annulment was not fulfilled by the debtor of little importance for the full obligations).
So Valveskh not only be in binding contracts for the two sides as well as a right of the contractor to resolve the contractual bond if the other Contracting commitment not fulfilled until liberated in turn, obligations incurred under the contract replaces an annulment.
Conditions of termination of the contract: -
According to the first paragraph of Article 119 of BC for the annulment of the contract you must be met three conditions:
: Contract replaces annulment binding for both sides / 1
This condition is the real is logical self-evident, with no benefit to the creditor in binding to one side of the annulment of the contract, but the contract reflects the interest of keeping the contract and to demand its implementation.
And the creditor interest in a binding contract for both sides were required to terminate the contract because the creditor at the same time a debtor, and as long as the contractual relationship the list is the demands of its implementation carry obligations under the contract and could creditor through annulment to get rid of these commitments, the other contractor has been implemented Committed to it
: Lack of commitment to the contractor / 2 Wafa
Article 119 BC has explicitly indicated that this condition (... if not one of the Contracting fulfilled his obligation ...)
You have already sanction is the contractor for the implementation of its commitment to abstinence, and Batalli not entitled to the contractor demanding cancellation of the contract unless breached other Contracting commitment and intended not to force is the total lack of implementation of the commitment, as well as partial or delays in the implementation as well as the bad execution perform as a contractor as well as in breach of its obligation to even comment it's obligations consequential or secondary.
: Fulfillment of his commitment demanded annulment / 3
Not this requirement is contained in the text of Article 119 BC is that it is unreasonable to hold the contractor terminate the contract due to non-implementation of the other Contracting for his commitment if he did not initiate the implementation of its obligations is a must if not be demanded annulment remiss in the implementation of commitment and this requires to have In his promise, or at least be prepared to meet him. but if he breached his commitment to turn the behavior be like the other contracting behavior and therefore we do not see a justification why we prefer to protect his interests through the annulment of the contract on the second contracted interest expense.

  • 249 Times


Telephone :
Mobile :



Khartoum - Sudan
Bahri - Block 22